The seven sweeps
One lens at a time. Seven passes. Every word audited.
Seven passes, one lens each.
Sweep 1: Clarity
No sentence should require a re-read. Flag nested clauses, ambiguous pronouns, undefined jargon.
[VAGUE] for ambiguous claims. [JARGON] for unexplained terms.
Sweep 2: Voice and tone
Catch formality shifts between sections. [VOICE-SHIFT] where register breaks.
Sweep 3: So what
Read each sentence. Ask "so what?" No answer? Cut.
[DEAD-WEIGHT] for zero-value sentences. [FEATURE-NOT-BENEFIT] for missing outcomes.
Sweep 4: Prove it
Every claim: how would you verify it?
[TELL-NOT-SHOW] for unearned adjectives. [NO-PROOF] for claims without numbers or references.
Sweep 5: Specificity
[GENERIC] for vague claims. "Teams" becomes "5-person engineering teams at Series A startups."
Sweep 6: Emotion
[FLAT] where emotional weight is missing. Spec sheets can be neutral. Heroes and CTAs cannot.
Sweep 7: Zero risk
[FRICTION] for unclear commitments and missing reassurance.
Worked example
Start: "Our platform is designed to help teams collaborate more effectively."
Sweep 3: "Collaborate more effectively" answers no question the reader asked. [DEAD-WEIGHT]
Sweep 4: "more effectively" is unearned. No number, no proof. [TELL-NOT-SHOW]
Sweep 5: "teams." Which teams? How large? [GENERIC]
Rewrite: "Engineering teams of 5 to 15 ship code reviews in half the time."
Why the order matters
- Clarity makes it understandable.
- Voice makes it consistent.
- So what removes dead weight.
- Prove it backs claims.
- Specificity replaces generic with concrete.
- Emotion adds temperature.
- Zero risk removes last barriers.
Flag everything before rewriting. Resolve after all seven.
Quick-pass version
Three sweeps: Clarity, So what, Prove it. Ten minutes.
Word-level cuts
Kill on sight: "very," "really," "truly," "just," "simply," "easily," "actually," "basically," "essentially."
Front-load the key claim. Cut openings that start with "There is," "It is," or "We believe."