npx skills add mblode/agent-skills --skill docs-writing- IS: writing and auditing technical documentation quality (Diataxis doc types, voice, structure, clarity, runnable code, formatting, navigation, content hygiene) for docs sites, API references, documentation-site tutorials, how-to docs, and existing READMEs.
- IS NOT: editorial blog tutorials or articles (use the external
ghostwriterskill with platformblog), a README from scratch (usereadme-creator), AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md instructions (useagents-md), or marketing and landing-page copy (usecopywriting).
Mode dispatch
- Reviewing docs? → Audit workflow.
- Writing/rewriting a page? → Writing workflow.
- “Improve”/“fix” docs? → Audit first, then apply fixes yourself.
Audit workflow
Track this checklist:
Docs audit progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Scope to changed files unless a full sweep was requested
- [ ] Step 2: Classify each doc (tutorial, how-to, reference, explanation) and audience
- [ ] Step 3: Run CRITICAL categories (voice-, structure-)
- [ ] Step 4: Run HIGH categories (clarity-, code-)
- [ ] Step 5: Run remaining in-scope categories (format-, nav-, scan-, hygiene-, review-)
- [ ] Step 6: Report per the output contract, by severityDoc type gates which rules apply, so classify before loading. Load rule files by category prefix (rules/voice-*.md, then rules/structure-*.md, …) only for in-scope categories. After applying fixes, rerun the rules that produced findings before finalizing.
Writing workflow
Track this checklist:
Docs writing progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Pick one Diataxis type per file (tutorial, how-to, reference, explanation); name the audience
- [ ] Step 2: Read defaults bundles (voice-defaults, clarity-defaults, scan-defaults) plus structure rules for the type
- [ ] Step 3: Draft: bottom line up front, quick start for getting-started docs, runnable example per concept
- [ ] Step 4: Self-audit against CRITICAL and HIGH categories; fix findings
- [ ] Step 5: Verify: run every example, resolve every link, confirm parameter names against the implementationStep 5 is the exit criterion: a doc ships only after its examples run and links resolve, not when it “reads well”.
Rule categories by priority
| Priority | Category | Impact | Prefix | Rules |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Voice & Tone | CRITICAL | voice- |
4 |
| 2 | Structure & Organization | CRITICAL | structure- |
9 |
| 3 | Clarity & Language | HIGH | clarity- |
5 |
| 4 | Code Examples | HIGH | code- |
7 |
| 5 | Formatting & Syntax | MEDIUM-HIGH | format- |
7 |
| 6 | Navigation & Linking | MEDIUM-HIGH | nav- |
6 |
| 7 | Scanability & Readability | MEDIUM | scan- |
2 |
| 8 | Content Hygiene | MEDIUM | hygiene- |
6 |
| 9 | Review & Testing | LOW-MEDIUM | review- |
2 |
For the full rule list per category, read rules/_sections.md. The *-defaults.md files (voice, clarity, scan, review) are multi-check bundles, 2-5 baseline checks each.
Output contract (audit mode)
## Documentation Audit Findings
### path/to/file.md
- [CRITICAL] `voice-defaults`: Passive voice obscures who performs the action.
- Fix: Rewrite "The configuration is loaded by the server" as "The server loads the configuration."
### path/to/clean-file.md
- ✓ pass- Group by file; order by severity within each file.
- Use
file:linewhen available. - Every finding names the rule, states the issue, proposes a fix. No fix, not reportable.
- List clean files as
✓ passso the author knows they were checked.
Gotchas
- Doc-type misclassification is the top false-positive source:
structure-quick-startapplies only to getting-started docs and READMEs,scan-three-column-apionly to API references. Flagging a missing quick start on an explanation page tells the author to break Diataxis. - Cite the specific failing check in a
*-defaults.mdbundle (“voice-defaults: passive voice”), not just the filename, or the author can’t locate the issue. - Don’t load all 48 rule files up front; load by prefix for in-scope categories only, to avoid flooding context before scope is known.
- Don’t rank MEDIUM/LOW polish above CRITICAL/HIGH; authors fix what they see first, so a serial-comma nit can bury a structure problem.
- Don’t rewrite content you were asked to review; report and propose fixes unless the user said “improve/fix”.
- Don’t audit unchanged files unless a full sweep was explicitly requested; unscoped findings drown the real ones.
Related skills
readme-creator: a README from scratch; this skill audits and improves existing ones.agents-md: AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md instruction files (execution-first, not reader-facing docs).copywriting: marketing, landing-page, and product copy.- Optional external
ghostwriterwhere installed: editorial tutorials, how-to articles, thought leadership, and long-form posts, drafted from theblogplatform profile. - Optional external
blodemdwhere installed: scaffolds/deploys MDX docs sites; this skill governs content quality inside them.